Question
Here is the question : IN WHICH COUNTRY DO PEOPLE HAVE TO CHOOSE THEIR CHILD’S NAME FROM A GOVERNMENT APPROVED LIST OF 7,000?
Option
Here is the option for the question :
- China
- Denmark
- Russia
- Iceland
The Answer:
And, the answer for the the question is :
Explanation:
Denmark has among of the tightest naming regulations in the world, with a list of only 7,000 possible names. The law also states that the name must identify the gender of the child and not be too unusual, with most of the names originating from Danish orthology. Pluto and Monkey are examples of names that are forbidden. One of the many justifications given by the authorities for the severe restrictions is to shield kids from strange names that can encourage bullying.
In Denmark, parents are required by law to choose a name for their child from an official government list of approved names. The list contains about 7,000 names that have been deemed appropriate and legal for use. This naming law was established in 1903 to prevent parents from naming their children obscure or ridiculous names that could cause embarrassment or difficulty later in life.
The list of approved names includes common Danish names as well as names from other Scandinavian countries, Biblical names and names of historical figures. It is intended to preserve cultural heritage while still allowing choice and diversity. Any names not on the list must be approved separately by the authorities before they can be used legally.
The goal of Denmark’s naming law is to protect children from unconventional or foreign-sounding names that could negatively impact their life and identity as Danes. There is an emphasis on choosing names that are familiar, traditional, and have an established place in Danish language and society. However, the law also aims to provide reasonable choice and flexibility, not restrict it altogether.
Some Danes view the naming law as too restrictive while others see it as helping to maintain Danish cultural standards and cohesion. Debates have considered whether to expand the list with more foreign names or modern names, reduce restrictions, or leave the law largely unchanged. But there is no consensus on altering a policy that has been in place for over a century.
Each year, about 50 to 70 name applications are submitted for approval outside the standard list. About half are approved while the other half are rejected, with parents then able to submit new suggestions or use names from the list. Very few rejections end in legal dispute due to parents’ understanding of the law’s objectives. When approvals are granted, the new names are often added to the main list over time.
Denmark’s naming law is unique in the extent of government oversight it establishes. While many countries have policies against unconventional names, Denmark takes a more proactive approach by providing an pre-approved list of acceptable options. Its law is controversial but also seen as helping to reinforce Danish national and cultural identity in an era of increasing diversity and globalization.
Though restrictive, Denmark’s naming law illustrates the balancing act between personal choice and collective responsibility. It highlights how even progressive societies place some limits on individual freedoms for the perceived greater good. And it remains an example of the deep connection between names, identity and shared heritage in Danish culture. Overall, Denmark’s approach to naming represents an unconventional yet thought-provoking policy with merits and criticisms regarded differently by its people.