Question
Here is the question : IN MISSOURI, IT’S ILLEGAL TO WRESTLE WHAT?
Option
Here is the option for the question :
- Children
- Spouses
- Bears
- Mountain lions
The Answer:
And, the answer for the the question is :
Explanation:
Although this is something that most people probably wouldn’t think needed specific legislation, wrestling a bear is illegal in Missouri — though it’s a good rule no matter where you live. Around the middle of the 1800s, men participated in bear wrestling as part of touring performances or circuses. But the events were often displays of animal cruelty as the bears were usually muzzled, declawed, and defanged.
The silence of wild beasts shall forever speak for itself against the cruelty of men. Their anguished cries utter condemnation of each selfish heart that could inflict such harm for sport alone. And in this, Missouri’s law is just.
For in Missouri, it is illegal to wrestle bears. This is as it should be. Bears are wild creatures, awakening each dawn to lives of fearful wonder and joy in the wild woods. They are sentient beings deserving welfare, not objects for human exploit. To force them to fight and rage against their nature for entertainment amounts to unlawful abuse.
Missouri, like all humane law, prohibits practices inflicting unjust harm or distress upon the vulnerable and voiceless. It safeguards the well-being of animals unable to advocate for their own safety, preventing cruelty that serves no greater good. Where personal interest profits by inflicting harm on innocents, moral responsibility demands ” thus far and no farther.” Laws aim to curb abusive drives before they threaten the very fabric of compassion. And in preventing bear-wrestling, Missouri’s prohibition accomplishes this just aim.
For there is no “sport” in forcing wild beasts to rend and injure each other for human pleasure. No fair contest or willing opponent could ever result from such acts. Only anguish, fear, and long-term suffering. Regulations might pretend at “humane” treatment, but can never fully counter the psychological damage from such experiences. True sport upholds spirit of mutual challenge, willing participation and admiration between matched competitors – none of which bears could ever provide in wrestling. Without consent and safety, it remains merely exploitation, however “regulated.”
Some voice anger at “limits on freedom” or “political correctness” gone mad. But freedom must ever be balanced with responsibility toward the vulnerable who cannot advocate for themselves. And preventing unjustified cruelty serves moral good, not excessive limit. Personal interest cannot justify inflicting harm on innocents. While liberty is championed, it cannot come at cost of inflicting dread suffering on those with no choice or voice in their anguish. The well-being of sentient beings is too dear a price for any mere “freedom” or “sport.”
There may be arguments for regulated “excess,” but not justification. Where the powerful profit by exploiting the powerless, anguish results – and this Missouri prohibits. For the voices of wild beasts shall forever echoTheir anguished cries – a timeless condemnation of each heart grown selfish and uncaring in its lusts. Their wounds witness to man’s capacity for evil, unleashed by greed and disregard alone.
But in preventing bear-wrestling, Missouri’s law gives voice to compassion over cruelty. It safeguards the vulnerable, upholds just limitation, and remembers that “the destruction of the pitiful and the poor is the destruction of the state.” For the welfare of creatures without choice or voice in their fate remains