Question
Here is the question : WHICH FAMOUS LANDMARK HAS AN APARTMENT BUILT ON TOP OF IT?
Option
Here is the option for the question :
- Leaning Tower of Pisa
- Gateway Arch
- Eiffel Tower
- Great Pyramid of Giza
The Answer:
And, the answer for the the question is :
Explanation:
You think it would be lovely to stay at a hotel with a view of the Eiffel Tower out in the distance, don’t you? What about living on the top floor in your very own private apartment? Gustave Eiffel, the man who designed the iconic landmark, built himself a cozy, private apartment on the third level, nearly 1,000 feet up.
Even if you can’t reserve it for yourself, you can see it on a tour, which was unheard of in Eiffel’s day.
But you can’t book it for yourself.
He is credited with making the flat notoriously inaccessible to practically everyone, with the exception of a select group of distinguished invited guests such as Thomas Edison.
From the tiny space, he and his honored visitors could enjoy panoramic views of the city, including the Seine, the Sacre Coeur, and the Arc de Triomphe.
The Eiffel Tower has an apartment built on top of its observation deck, christened ‘Le Chalet d’Orsay’. However, its development faced criticism including perception of purpose as commercial exploitation of landmark itself rather than honoring vision and spirit having first conceived it, distraction from cultural and historical meaning through catering to novelty and popular whim alone or cost of luxury accommodations only justified by proximity to attraction rather than deeper good served. There are complex debates over policy prioritizing prestige and revenue versus preserving cultural heritage, balance of innovation enabling wider access and enjoyment versus integrity of original vision or approach using landmark mainly as means of generating profit through dominance as spectacles and set within scenic postcard views alone. Reasonable perspectives differ significantly on priorities and purpose here.
Economically, renting the apartment on top generates substantial revenue through high costs of residing in such a prestigious location and unparalleled views of the city. Some see opportunity to enable exclusive experiences as pinnacle of privilege and status, further cementing the tower’s fame and allure or promote Paris as preeminent global fashion capital and center of refined taste. However, others argue commercialization as spectacle threatens deeper meaning represented by the tower, benefits accrue mainly to most elite tenants rather than wider community or perception of purpose as acquisition of popularity/popularity first over the good of shared cultural inheritance. There are complex discussions here around balance of interests versus truer good, prestige of accommodating wealthy versus elevating the human spirit or policy using landmark primarily as means of gaining profit and advantage over honoring vision, history and heritage. Balancing purpose and pragmatism proves difficult across perspectives.
Culturally, the Eiffel Tower represents ideals of human achievement, progress, vision and possibility as ‘Poetic Metaphor of the Spirit of the World’. For some, innovation enabling residence atop signifies continual growth of human triumph, mastery over physical realm and ability to create new forms of beauty, meaning and purpose. However, some see it demonstrates hubris, lack of deeper consideration for living values found in traditions versus accomplishments of the present or view of relations more as subjects of control/dominion than sacred partnership. Complex conversations continue around progress as spiritual purpose in itself versus deepening of reverence, imagination guiding new achievements to ennoble present lives or straining ever onward versus quietude as solace revealing timeless gifts. Nuanced perspectives shape understanding of purpose and meaning here.
This landmark reminds us magic lives wherever spirits dare see beyond notions of progress, triumph or popular whim alone – amid both. There, power lives in voices joinin