Question
Here is the question : WWI TANKS USED TO BE SPLIT INTO TWO GROUPS ACCORDING TO WHAT?
Option
Here is the option for the question :
- Color
- Gender
- Size
- Country
The Answer:
And, the answer for the the question is :
Explanation:
During World War I’s bloody Battle of the Somme, tanks were first used in combat. The dangerous vehicles were originally divided into male and female categories. Tanks equipped with cannons were deemed masculine, while those with machine guns were seen as feminine.
During World War I, tanks were a relatively new technology, and their development and deployment were still evolving. In the early stages of the war, tanks were split into two groups based on their perceived gender characteristics: “male” and “female.”
The distinction between “male” and “female” tanks had nothing to do with the actual gender of the tanks, but rather referred to the types of weapons mounted on the tanks. “Male” tanks were equipped with heavy guns and cannons, while “female” tanks were armed with machine guns.
The decision to equip tanks with different types of weapons was based on the perceived roles of the tanks on the battlefield. “Male” tanks were intended to take on heavily fortified enemy positions, while “female” tanks were used to provide cover and support for infantry troops.
The distinction between “male” and “female” tanks was not without controversy. Some military leaders felt that the division was unnecessary and confusing, and that it would be better to have all tanks equipped with a mix of weapons.
the “male” and “female” tank designations remained in use throughout the war. In fact, the use of tanks became increasingly important as the war progressed, and tanks played a significant role in several key battles, including the Battle of Cambrai in 1917.
After World War I, the distinction between “male” and “female” tanks fell out of use, and tanks were designed and equipped based on their intended roles on the battlefield, rather than gendered characteristics. However, the legacy of the “male” and “female” tanks lives on in popular culture and military history.
The use of gendered terms to describe tanks reflects a broader cultural fascination with assigning gender roles and characteristics to objects and concepts. This tendency can be seen in other areas of popular culture, such as the use of gendered language to describe cars or boats.
The use of gendered language in military contexts can also reflect broader societal attitudes towards gender roles and expectations. Historically, the military has been seen as a male-dominated institution, and the use of gendered language may reflect a desire to reinforce traditional gender roles and expectations.
However, the use of gendered language in military contexts can also have unintended consequences. It can reinforce stereotypes and contribute to a culture of sexism and discrimination. It can also create confusion and misunderstandings, as was the case with the “male” and “female” tanks during World War I.
In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the need to address gender-based discrimination and stereotypes in the military. Efforts have been made to increase the representation of women in the military and to promote gender equality and inclusivity.
the division of World War I tanks into “male” and “female” categories based on their weapons reflects a broader cultural fascination with assig